LevLearnTry Lev
← All concepts/Fundraising

LPs and GPs (Limited Partners and General Partners)

The two sides of a venture fund: Limited Partners (LPs) commit the capital, and General Partners (GPs), the investors a founder actually meets, are hired by those LPs to invest it well.

Why does LPs and GPs (Limited Partners and General Partners) matter?

A partner's money is not their own, and understanding whose it actually is explains a lot of investor behavior that otherwise looks arbitrary. LPs, pension funds, university endowments, family offices, and funds of funds, commit capital to a GP for a fixed term, usually around a decade, expecting a strong return at the end of it. GPs earn a small management fee to run the firm day to day, but their real incentive is carry, typically a share of the fund's profit, which is what actually aligns a GP with getting an investment right rather than merely deploying capital. A partner who passes on a company is protecting a decision they will have to defend to the people who trusted them with a fixed, finite pool.

What does LPs and GPs (Limited Partners and General Partners) look like in practice?

A $200 million fund raised from a mix of pension funds and family offices commits that capital for roughly ten years. The two General Partners running the fund earn a 2% annual management fee, about $4 million a year, to cover salaries and operations, and stand to earn 20% of whatever profit the fund returns above what LPs put in. If the fund returns $600 million against $200 million invested, the GPs' carry on that $400 million of profit is worth far more than a decade of management fees, which is exactly why a GP's real attention goes to which companies can plausibly drive that outcome.

What are the common mistakes with LPs and GPs (Limited Partners and General Partners)?

  • Assuming a partner's personal money is on the line the way a bank's own capital is, when it is LP capital the GP is stewarding under a fiduciary obligation.
  • Reading every pass as a judgment on the business, when it is sometimes a judgment about what this particular GP can defend to their own LPs given the fund's stage and mandate.
  • Not asking a fund about its own fundraising cycle and how much of its current fund is already deployed, both of which shape how eager and how fast that GP can move.
  • Confusing management fee with carry, and missing that carry, not the fee, is what actually motivates a GP's investment decisions.

Related concepts

  • Lead Investor and the Term SheetThe lead investor is the firm that sets the terms of a round and typically writes its largest check; the term sheet is the document in which they propose those terms before legal work begins.
  • Pre-Seed, Seed, and Series AThe named stages of early venture financing, distinguished not by dollar amount but by what the company has proven and what the round is meant to buy.

Not seeing what you need?

A single term or a whole area we have not covered yet. Both are useful, and what founders ask for is how we decide what to write next.

Stop looking these up one at a time

Lev works through the whole arc with you: customers, positioning, pricing, the pitch. It explains the vocabulary as it goes.

Start with your idea
Lev

Lev is an AI co-founder that works the whole arc with you: customers, positioning, pricing, the pitch. Lev Learn is the vocabulary that comes up along the way.

Start something

  • Build your company
  • Idea Finder
  • Founder Type
  • Lev Learn
  • Zeitgeist

Lev Learn

  • All concepts
  • Guides

Change the way you build your business

Privacy PolicyTerms of Service