
Axial
No partners on file- Funds on file
- 13
- Partners named
- 0

0 on a current fund
last 24 months
across filed funds
| Vehicle | Filed | Target | Sold to date | Investors |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IN Fund I, a series of Axial Venture | October 2022 | $155,677 | $155,677 | 17 |
| APE Fund I, a series of Axial Venture | July 2022 | $52,500 | $52,500 | 5 |
| ST Fund I, a series of Axial Venture | May 2022 | $258,000 | $258,000 | 39 |
| Fund I, a series of Axial Discovery | April 2022 | $100M | $1.1M | 12 |
| CH Fund II, a series of Axial Venture | April 2022 | $577,707 | $577,707 | 30 |
| Axial Venture REP Fund I, a series of Axial Venture | March 2022 | $297,999 | $297,999 | 11 |
| EN Fund I, a series of Axial Venture | February 2022 | $541,000 | $541,000 | 16 |
| CH Fund I, a series of Axial Venture | October 2021 | $56,900 | $56,900 | 9 |
| DE Fund I, a series of Axial Venture | September 2021 | $108,000 | $108,000 | 11 |
| SI Fund I, a series of Axial Venture | August 2021 | $258,000 | $258,000 | 11 |
| AP Fund I, a series of Axial Venture | March 2021 | $204,000 | $204,000 | 13 |
| TI Fund I, a series of Axial Venture | March 2021 | $89,000 | $89,000 | 9 |
| Fund I, a series of Axial Venture | June 2020 | $10M | $2.2M | 30 |
Amounts are Item 13 as filed: the target is the whole offering, and the amount sold is cumulative across amendments rather than a final close. The filing carries no per-investor amount, so a firm’s own cheque is not recoverable here.
0 partners are named across this firm’s filings, 0 of them on a fund it is deploying now.
Activity is filed board seats in the last 24 months: 4+ Active, 2–3 Selective, 1 Slowing, none Quiet. A firm's tier totals its partners, so an active firm may be four partners with one seat each. It undercounts partners who invest without taking a board seat, and filings lag a closing by weeks, so Quiet means the paperwork is quiet, not the person.
Too few companies classified yet to infer a focus. 0 of 0 portfolio companies are classified.
Not a filing value: this is Lev’s own classification of each company, one company one vote regardless of how many of Axial’s partners are named on its board, shown only when we found a specific, checkable source. Companies with no source read as unclassified and are left out of the shares above.
No other firm shares a filed board seat with Axial yet. That is a gap in what we have read, not a claim that Axial invests alone.
A shared board seat: a company where filings name a Axial partner and a partner at the other firm, both with a clean identity match. Not a claim either firm led or co-led the round, only that both are named on the same board.